The soil monitoring programs in the Nordic and Baltic countries are often too small to provide a basis for drawing scientific conclusions. Therefore, the SNS-funded research network NorForSoil has worked to gather both researchers and their data, thereby creating a larger, common knowledge bank.
Contact/text: Lise Dalsgaard (lise.dalsgaard(a)nibio.no)

Salvatore Parisi, NIBIO, digging. Photo: Irene Marongiu, Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research (NIBIO)
Thousands of years with cool and moist climates have resulted in large contemporary soil carbon stocks in Nordic and Baltic forests; forests that are actively managed to help feed global needs for wood products. Several national soil monitoring programs are in place to follow trends in soil characteristics.
But the observations are often too few to attain the statistical certainty necessary for robust conclusions. The annual SNS network NorForSoil explored the potential of merging national Nordic and Baltic monitoring data on forest soil quality and carbon to enable robust cross-border analyses and broadly applicable results facilitating policy development, mandatory environmental reporting and sustainable forest management.
NorForSoil included all Nordic and Baltic countries, partnering also with Canada and Germany.
Forest soil monitoring programs

Photo: Irene Marongiu, Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research (NIBIO)
National forest soil monitoring programs track the development in soil health indicators and carbon content by regular sampling of forest soils in a way that represents the forest soil of a whole country. After drying, sieving, weighing and chemically analysing the soil samples, soil carbon stores and other metrics are calculated to document soil conditions over time.
Such data maps the variation around a level or trend to provide baselines of soil conditions, under the present biophysical, economic and societal conditions.
Such baselines are critical for detecting changes.
Regional synergy by merging data is challenging
Forest soil inventories have been carried out in most of the Nordic and Baltic countries, with programs emerging at different times in response to national priorities. As a result, methodologies differ among countries at least in some respects. These differences – though not unexpected or incorrect – prevents the immediate data merging, analysis, and comparison across countries. This is a challenge for the reporting under international agreements, such as to the EU and UNFCCC, which increasingly move towards using comparable data across nations.
A recent example is the newly proposed EU soil monitoring law where consistent and large amounts of data are needed to define criteria and indicators of soil health as well as to perform the reporting on compliance. Further, carbon trading schemes increasingly request methods to document forest soils, methods that can only be developed with large amounts of consistent data. Despite the many similarities in forests of Nordic-Baltic countries, systematic attempts to harmonize monitoring methods and data are scarce and requires cross-national collaborations.
Addressing the challenge – with limited means
NorForSoil addressed these challenges in three ways:
1 By conducting a survey among national forest soil monitoring programs in the Nordic-Baltic region and beyond for an overview of similarities and differences. READ MORE ON THE SURVEY
2 By collaborating on a specific case to harmonize a small subset of existing data to study the development of soil carbon stocks following clear cut harvest. READ MORE ON THE CASE
3 By gathering researchers, monitoring team members and stakeholders we facilitated numerous discussions on methodologies, current and future, and data usage with the intention to ease knowledge transfer and collaboration. READ MORE ON THE COLLABORATION
We believe the activities of the NorForSoil network have created meaningful progress towards guiding policy and forest management on forest soil issues in the Nordic-Baltic region. NorForSoil has facilitated the efficient use of the knowledge and invested data in a region subject to climatic changes, supplying a significant part of the global timber needs and thus carrying the potential burdens of negative management effects in our forest ecosystems. Further, the network has worked to ensure that our forest soils are represented in an accurate and meaningful way in international reporting. Case studies were limited to soil carbon; however, the recent emergence of the EU soil monitoring law makes it apparent that soil carbon is just one among many indicators of soil function and health for which national data sets should be used jointly.
Visit NorForSoil